Skip to main content

NO to LGBTQ Adoption Discrimination







#AdoptionDiscrimination#FamilyEqualityCouncil #FosterCare #LGBTQ #LGBTQyouth, #LosAngelesLGBTCenter


The Family Equality Council has partnered with organizations such as Lambda Legal, PFLAG, and Voice for Adoption to create the Every Child Deserves a Family Campaign. The campaign is over 400 members strong and is working with LGBT and other civil rights organizations as well as businesses to fight this amendment on the state and federal level.

“This has actually been floated in other bills, and whenever we’ve heard of it we’ve been able to shut it down. But this one was done very sneakily, very last-minute. So we’re gonna have to continue fighting it now,” Kruse said.

Other organizations have recognized the danger of this amendment and seek to inform members of Congress of the extent of discrimination the amendment would allow.

“At this point in the appropriations bill process, HRC is working with a coalition of organizations — including child welfare advocates — to educate members of Congress on the truly harmful impact this license to discriminate would have,” said Stephen Peters (above, center), senior national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign. “If the amendment remains in the final bill, it would grant a ‘license to discriminate’ in the provision of child welfare services, allowing child welfare placing agencies using taxpayer money to turn away qualified prospective parents — including LGBTQ couples, interfaith couples, and more — for reasons that have nothing to do with the best interest of the child in need. It's absolutely imperative that members of Congress reject this discriminatory amendment and not include it in the final appropriations bill.”

Organizations such as the National LGBTQ Task Force are also working with members of Congress to make sure this bill does not progress any further while it includes the discriminatory language.

“The Task Force takes these anti-equality bills very seriously,” said Alex Morash, media and public relations director. “We are talking with our allies in Congress. We are asking the tens of thousands of faith leaders and Task Force supporters to join us in urging congressional leaders to stop this anti-families bill,” 

Should the amendment make its way into the final bill, more than just LGBT children and prospective parents are put at risk?

And as the language in this bill is broader than that of any laws that condone discrimination on the state level, some fear that it will include discrimination based on marital status, allowing organizations to turn away single parents looking to adopt. Since 28 percent of prospective parents looking to adopt from the foster care system are single — and that number is higher in minority communities — experts fear there will be a racial aspect to this condoned discrimination. The bill also may allow parents to force their religious practices on children who do not share their beliefs and even subject LGBT kids to conversion therapy.

“We’re talking about undermining many, many kinds of protections, and discrimination not just based on sexual orientation and gender identity, but also on religion, for children or parents, and definitely on marital status,” Kruse said.

Grassroots organizations such as the Center for Action Network, a coalition for LGBT community centers based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., are using their resources to reach out to constituents in the hope of making a change.

“The ones [congressmen and senators] pay most attention to are their constituents, so we want to energize those groups back at home to take action and make their voice very loud and clear that this is not OK,” said Terry Stone (above, right), a representative of the coalition. “Discrimination like this hurts all of us.”

The network has been working with over 200 centers and communicating with its 100,000 subscribers to make sure that constituents are raising their voices.

“It’s going to take all of us working together and raising our voices to tell our Congress folks that this is not right and it’s not OK to discriminate, and we need to do all we can to create new, loving families for those who are looking for ways to be adopted,” Stone said.

Activists say action against this bill is crucial, as its passage would encourage efforts to discriminate against LGBT people on several other fronts.“For our opponents, this is the beginning. This is a wedge issue that they found some leverage on


” Kruse said. “They start with adoption, but they want to strip us of marriage equality and get us to what [Supreme Court Justice Ruth] Bader Ginsburg called ‘marriage equality lite.’ And they want government-funded services that don’t have to serve people of certain religions, don’t have to serve gay people, don’t have to serve transgender people, don’t have to serve single people. And that’s the scary part of this. We need to stop it here. We need to stop it now.”

BY MARY GRACE LEWIS
JULY 13 2018


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9 things about MLK's speech and the March on Washington

 #MLK  #MartinLutherKingJr  #MarchonWashington #IHaveaDream "I have a dream this afternoon that my four little children will not come up in the same young days that I came up within, but they will be judged on the basis of the content of their character, not the color of their skin." The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke these words in 1963, but this was not the speech that would go down as one of the most important addresses in US history. King spoke these words in Detroit, two months before he addressed a crowd of nearly 250,000 with his resounding "I Have a Dream" speech at the March on Washington for Freedom and Jobs on August 28, 1963. Several of King's staff members actually tried to discourage him from using the same "I have a dream" refrain again. As we all know, that didn't happen. But how this pivotal speech was crafted is just one of several interesting facts about what is one of the most important moments in the 2...

A Brief History of Skittles - Taste the rainbow

#Candy #Skittles #TastetheRainbow The candy that we are so familiar with today first came into existence in 1974. Skittles spent the first five years of their lives solely in Britain since it wasn’t until 1979 that North America got a chance to taste  the  rainbow. There is much speculation surrounding the creator of Skittles, as nobody really knows exactly who first made them. One story suggests that a British man named Mr. Skittles looked at a rainbow one day and wondered how it would taste. Other sources state that the Wrigley Company, founded in 1891, created candy and other confectionery, including Extra chewing gum. However, although Wrigley produces Skittles today, it is widely accepted that an unknown British company was the original manufacturer. After three years of being imported to North America from the UK, Skittles started being manufactured in the US and Britain. There were very few flavors compared to the varieties available today. Consumers enjoyed gra...

National Pi Day 2019

#NationalPiDay #Pi #314159265359 

Remembering Martin Luther King Jr.

#MLK #Assassination #MartinLutherKingJr #Memorial  National Civil Rights Museum The Lorraine Motel where James Earl Ray assassinated King on April 4, 1968, is a complex of museums that trace the civil rights movement in the U.S. from the 17th century to the present. #MLK #MartinLutherKingJr #Memorial https://www.civilrightsmuseum.org/